PDK formalizes opposition stance, experts warn of internal divisions

The Democratic Party of Kosovo has decided to remain in opposition during the formation of new institutions. Its chairman, Bedri Hamza, made this orientation clear after talks with acting Prime Minister Albin Kurti, held on July 10, 2026.

Hamza announced that PDK will play the role of a constructive opposition in the Assembly. He emphasized that the party does not set red lines in achieving its priorities in economy, energy, education and justice. However, after correct consultations, PDK remains in opposition and wishes success to Mr. Kurti and other political forces.

The head of PDK added that cooperation with all political entities will continue for the interest of citizens and that PDK’s vote will be in favor of any issue of national interest, including international financial agreements.

Analyst Zejnullah Jakupi, in a statement to “Bota sot”, assesses that this decision aims to preserve the opposition identity and avoid involvement in a governing agreement that would place PDK in a secondary role. According to him, this move could affect the functioning of institutions, especially if the parliamentary majority fails to secure the numbers for key positions on its own.

Jakupi emphasizes that PDK, even from the opposition, can become a decisive factor in the election of the President of the Republic, having significant negotiating weight. This weight can be used as a stabilizing factor through an institutional agreement, or as a blocking factor in the absence of compromise. He warns of two possible scenarios: a political agreement for sharing responsibilities, or continued clashes that could lead to institutional delays and a new crisis, even early elections if the election of the President fails within constitutional deadlines.

According to Jakupi, PDK faces a strategic dilemma: to maintain a strong opposition stance or take the role of a state-forming party that helps resolve institutional blockades. Its choice will affect its long-term positioning on Kosovo’s political scene.

Meanwhile, analyst Faton Mehmeti highlights the internal divisions of PDK. He explains that the official line, represented by Bedri Hamza, deputy chairman Uran Ismaili and Vlora Çitaku, is in principle in favor of a coalition with Vetëvendosje. Opposite them stands a powerful wing, led by Sami Lushtaku and Elmi Reçica, which strongly opposes such an alliance.

Mehmeti assesses that Hamza is acting more as a situation manager than simply as chairman, trying to keep clashes between factions under control. According to him, the future of Hashim Thaçi and Kadri Veseli from the Hague Tribunal will be decisive for internal balances. If they are acquitted, they could maintain stability; if convicted, PDK could enter deep conflicts and Hamza would lose influence, opening a fight for party leadership.

Precisely for this reason, according to Mehmeti, Hamza keeps PDK in opposition, as advancing negotiations with Vetëvendosje risks dividing it. He describes the current state as a volcano under control that could erupt at any moment due to the three factions. However, if favorable circumstances are created and the necessary numbers secured, PDK could change its stance.