DUI: After Two Years of Investigation, There Is No Evidence; Political Indictment Concerns a Collective Decision

DUI has expressed deep concern over the filing of what it describes as a political indictment seeking to hold an individual accountable for a decision made collectively.

According to the party, following an investigation that lasted two years, the public should be informed of the specific arguments and evidence on which the charge is based.

DUI says it respects the independence of judicial institutions, while also demanding that justice be administered equally and without selectivity.

The party believes that collective decision-making should not be used as a means of selectively assigning responsibility or politically persecuting individuals.

For this reason, DUI is demanding full transparency throughout the process so that the public, media representatives and experts can review every claim, argument and piece of evidence presented by the parties.

DUI is also calling for the case to be subject to international oversight conducted openly and transparently. The party stresses that it is not seeking privileged treatment for anyone, but equal application of the law, due process and justice free from political influence. According to the party, the indictment is not supported by any testimony, evidence or facts.