VLEN: Nervousness grows in DUI as Ahmeti faces the Grubi dilemma

VLEN’s full statement

The signs of concern within DUI are no longer being concealed. Even voices from within the party itself have publicly acknowledged that it operates like a “POLITBURO,” where a small group devises scenarios, assigns roles and tries to present the situation as being under control. However, developments show that things have long since spiraled out of their control.

Positions on Artan Grubi are constantly changing. At one point, his name is avoided, while later it is said that there is no evidence against him. According to the position conveyed, Ali Ahmeti asked him to explain whether he had abused his trust, but shortly afterward declared that “the first thing” is for Grubi to be released from house arrest.

Which of these statements should be taken as true?

For Ahmeti, the situation appears increasingly difficult. Supporting Grubi would burden him with political responsibility for any developments that may emerge during the judicial proceedings. But if he distances himself from Grubi, there is a risk that the “black box” will be opened and events linked to the years of DUI’s rule will be made public.

This is also why tension within the party is mounting. Some fear that Grubi may speak, others are trying to determine whom he might implicate along with himself, while some are already considering who could be sacrificed to protect the party leadership. In this climate, Bujar Osmani continues to wait for the right moment.

Is Bujar trying to determine the moment when he will seek the leadership position, or does he first want to see what the “black box” will reveal?

The decision on the Grubi case will be made by the institutions that DUI trusted and swore by until yesterday. But according to VLEN, this hypocritical DUI accepts the institutions only when their decisions are in its favor. It should therefore stop pretending and clarify which of its stories is true.