AVONET and 13 organizations ask the Constitutional Court to interpret the constitution of the Assembly

AVONET, together with 13 other civil society organizations, has submitted a request to the Constitutional Court of Kosovo for a review of the manner in which Judgment KO124/25 is being implemented, concerning the deadline for the constitution of the Assembly.

According to AVONET’s statement to the media, the initiative was undertaken following recent developments in the procedure for constituting the Assembly elected in the June 7, 2026 elections.

The organizations assess that the 30-day deadline for constituting the Assembly expired on August 7. Meanwhile, the constitutive session held on August 6 did not conclude with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speakers of the Assembly.

Referring to Judgment KO124/25, they emphasize that holding a session that does not conclude with the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speakers cannot be considered the constitution of the Assembly.

AVONET said that the continuation of the session had been scheduled for August 8, after the 30-day deadline had expired.

Through their request, the organizations have asked the Constitutional Court to determine whether Judgment KO124/25 was implemented in accordance with its content and within the stipulated deadline.

The request is based on Rule 60 of the Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court, which sets out the procedure for claims concerning the non-implementation of a decision of the Court.

If the Court determines that the decision was not implemented, AVONET and the signatory organizations are requesting that the measures provided for by the rules be taken, including the issuance of a ruling on non-implementation or non-enforcement, as well as any other actions the Court may deem necessary.

AVONET considers this issue particularly important for the functioning of elected institutions and for ensuring respect for the constitutional order.

The organizations clarify that the purpose of the request is to create legal and institutional clarity regarding the process of constituting the Assembly and the implementation of decisions by the Constitutional Court.