However, it remains unclear whether political parties will find common ground within the legal deadlines, or whether the country could slide into an institutional deadlock.

Political analyst Zejnulla Jakupi spoke to “Bota sot” about what is expected to happen after the certification of the election results.

He initially explained that the constitutional phase for establishing the institutions has now begun and listed the main procedures that follow.

“After the certification of the results by the Central Election Commission (CEC), the constitutional phase for creating Kosovo’s new institutions begins. The certification of the results clears the way for the President to take steps toward constituting the Assembly and then forming the Government.

The main steps are: calling the constitutive session of the Assembly – the President must convene the first meeting of the Assembly within 30 days of the certification of the results. At this session, deputies take the oath and the speaker and deputy speakers of the Assembly are elected.

The mandate to form the Government will be given after the constitution of the Assembly, while the president mandates the candidate for prime minister, usually from the party or coalition that has won the most seats and has the ability to secure a parliamentary majority. The candidate must present the government cabinet and program for a vote in the Assembly,” he said.

Further on, Jakupi also spoke about the scenario in which there is no political agreement and the necessary votes to form the Government are not secured.

“At least 61 votes from 120 deputies are needed to approve the Government. What happens if there is no political agreement?

The law and the Constitution provide for procedures, but not always short deadlines that force a political solution. In practice, if the Assembly fails to constitute itself (for example, if the speaker is not elected), the process can remain blocked until the parties reach a compromise; if the candidate for prime minister does not secure a majority, other constitutional procedures for mandating may be followed, according to the interpretation of the Constitution and the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo; if no majority can be created, one of the final solutions may be the calling of new elections, according to constitutional procedures.”

The analyst also stressed that the establishment of the institutions is directly linked to securing a parliamentary majority and that the law, in itself, does not necessarily unblock the process.

In this context, he underlined the need for a broader political agreement, recalling that 81 votes are needed to elect the president.

“So, the process is not automatically unblocked by law in the absence of a political agreement. Constitutional mechanisms provide procedural steps, but the formation of institutions ultimately depends on securing a parliamentary majority and, in cases of disagreement, also on interpretations by the Constitutional Court.

An agreement must nevertheless be reached – a consensus – so that the president can be elected by the parliamentary majority with 81 votes, by choosing a non-political candidate,” Zejnulla Jakupi concluded for “Bota sot”.

The post After the certification of the results, what are the next steps? Zejnulla Jakupi explains the procedures and the possibility of a deadlock appeared first on Albeu.com.

The June 7 election was the third time Kosovo organized parliamentary voting in less than a year and a half.

From this electoral process, the Vetëvendosje Movement (LVV) secured 53 mandates. The Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK) won 22 seats, the Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) 18 seats, while the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) won seven seats.

Following the certification of the results, parliament speaker and at the same time acting president Albulena Haxhiu is obliged to convene the constitutive session of the Assembly.

The Constitution stipulates that this session must be held within 30 days of the certification of the results.

At the constitutive session, the Assembly is formally established, the speaker and deputy speakers are elected, and the way is then opened for the procedures to create the new Government.

After the Assembly is constituted, Haxhiu proposes the party that won the elections as the nominee to form the Government, which in this case is the Vetëvendosje Movement.

Radio Free Europe asked Haxhiu’s office when the constitutive session is expected to be called, but received no response.

According to Naim Jakaj, a researcher at the Kosovo Law Institute (IKD), although there is a constitutional deadline of 30 days from the certification, the session could also be convened much earlier.

“Given that the election results are already known, there is no objective reason for the process to be dragged out,” he said.

As an example, in the most recent parliamentary elections held months ago, the elected deputies constituted the Assembly and voted in the new Government on the same day, in a single session on February 11.

This had happened after representatives of the parliamentary parties and the then speaker of the Assembly, Dimal Basha, had agreed in advance on the agenda, including a package vote on the Assembly’s deputy speakers.

The process had also been eased by the convincing victory of the party of acting Prime Minister Albin Kurti, the Vetëvendosje Movement.

Since the ruling party appears to have the votes to constitute the Assembly and to form the Government, these two processes are not expected to face obstacles.

However, another issue could keep the country in a political and institutional crisis: the election of the new president.

Kurti’s party has won 53 seats in the 120-seat Assembly, while it needs at least 61 for the Assembly and the new Government.

Given Kurti’s cooperation so far with non-Serb minority parties, which hold 10 seats, votes for this process are not expected to be a problem.

LVV official Arbërie Nagavci told RFE days ago that the ruling party has secured the votes to form the new Government and that it will seek consensus with other parties for the election of the president.

Jakaj believes that Kurti will have to sit down with opposition parties to reach a political agreement, so that the country can have the long-term functioning of its institutions.

“A party that puts the state’s interest first should bear in mind that any delay in the formation of institutions produces costs for the country, whether in European integration, economic development, the implementation of reforms, or the loss of important opportunities for citizens,” Jakaj said.

For the vote for Kosovo’s president to be valid, the presence of 2/3 of deputies in the 120-seat Assembly is required.

If a political agreement is lacking, this remains impossible for any parliamentary party.

The Constitution provides that the president must be elected within 60 days from the day the Assembly is constituted.

If this does not happen, then the Assembly is dissolved and the country goes to new elections, Jakaj said.

So far, political parties have not held talks on a possible political agreement regarding the president.

Kurti has said he is ready for talks with other parties, while Nagavci told RFE that their party “will do everything” within its mandate to secure the votes needed to elect the new president.

PDK has said it would be open to talks with all parties, without excluding LVV, while LDK has set several preconditions for an agreement on the creation of new institutions, including the issue of American gas.

Jakaj stressed that the parties’ statements so far “show that the road to an agreement will not be easy.”

“Kurti has expressed readiness for dialogue with the other parties. But full transparency is needed here so that it is known whether this is genuine will. Public statements are not enough. There is no obstacle to the parties immediately starting discussions on a political agreement, because any delay increases the risk of a new institutional crisis and repeated elections,” Jakaj stressed.

If the country goes to elections again, then they would be the fourth parliamentary elections since the beginning of 2025.

The post CEC certifies the June 7 result, here are the next steps appeared first on Albeu.com.

One day after the results for ninth-grade students were made public, the enrollment competition for 10th grade has opened. The process began today and will remain open until July 9.

According to data published by the Ministry of Education, more than 21,000 students sat the Achievement Test this year, while the nationwide average stood at 48.35%, or below 50%. The best performance was recorded in English language, history and Albanian language. On the other hand, the weakest results were recorded in Chemistry and Mathematics, followed by Biology, Physics, Informatics and Geography. Education experts assess that these results reflect the same trend as in previous years.

“The results are the same as in the previous testing and there is no substantial change. A downward trend in performance is noticeable, especially in the Albanian language, and this shows the need for greater attention from institutions to ensure that students are acquiring the proper knowledge in these key areas,” says education expert Rinor Qehaja.

However, school leaders say their focus remains on working toward the highest possible student results.

“Every year we also conduct an internal achievement test. As the testing period comes to an end, we carry out a thorough analysis of the results, and we also analyze the scores from the achievement test. Then, we do these analyses again in August, when we assess the results from the previous year, and they help us identify setbacks and review achievements,” said Visar Osmani, director of the ‘Emin Duraku’ school.

The Ministry of Education and Science has also underlined that the Achievement Test results provide a picture of the level of competency acquisition by students at the end of lower secondary education and that they will serve as a basis for identifying priorities and planning measures to improve quality in education.

The post Experts: The Achievement Test highlights the same trend as in previous years appeared first on Albeu.com.

All five complaints were rejected as unfounded.

Through judgment AA.nr.29/2026, the Supreme Court dismissed as unfounded the complaint of the Serb List, filed against ECAP decision ZP.Anr.56/2026.

In its complaint, the Serb List had claimed that the political entity “GI – Za Slobodu, Pravdu i Opstanak” (ZSPO) had won the reserved mandate for the Serb community mainly thanks to votes received in municipalities and polling stations with an Albanian majority, arguing that in this way the constitutional purpose of authentic representation of the Serb community had been undermined.

The Supreme Court found that these claims do not stand. According to its reasoning, the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo and the Law on General Elections define the vote as personal, equal, free and secret, while the Voters List does not contain data on the ethnic affiliation of voters. Consequently, there is no legal basis for the validity or legal effect of a vote to be conditioned by the voter’s ethnic affiliation or by the demographic composition of the place where it was cast.

The Court also found that the complainant had not provided concrete evidence proving vote manipulation or any other electoral irregularity affecting the result. According to the Court, the claims were based on assumptions and statistical comparisons, which do not constitute a legal basis for intervening in the election result. It was also assessed that the very political entity that won the contested mandate is a registered entity for the representation of the Serb community, and therefore it cannot be considered that the constitutional mechanism of guaranteed seats was undermined.

With judgment AA.nr.30/2026, the Supreme Court also rejected as unfounded the complaint of candidate Emilija Rexhepi, from the political entity Nova Demokratska Stranka (NDS), filed against ECAP decision ZP.Anr.57/2026.

Rexhepi had challenged the ECAP decision by claiming that there was a discrepancy between the demographic structure of the settlement and the election result, and had requested the annulment of these votes for the purpose of allocating the guaranteed mandate for the Bosniak community.

The Court found that the complainant’s claims were based on statistical and demographic interpretations, which do not provide a legal basis to contest the validity of votes or the election result. According to it, the electoral legislation of the Republic of Kosovo does not recognize the ethnic structure of the population as a criterion for assessing the legality of voting or election results.

The Supreme Court also emphasized that the Voters List does not contain data on the ethnic affiliation of voters, while the Central Election Commission does not collect, administer or process such data. Consequently, there is no legal basis for ballots to be declared invalid on the basis of assumptions related to the ethnic affiliation of voters.

The panel of the Supreme Court further found that the complainant had not presented clear and convincing evidence of vote manipulation, interference in the voting process, breach of the chain of custody or violations of electoral procedures, as provided for in the Law on General Elections.

In judgment AA.nr.31/2026, the Supreme Court also dismissed as unfounded another complaint by candidate Emilija Rexhepi, from Nova Demokratska Stranka (NDS), filed against ECAP decision ZP.A.nr.58/2026.

In this case, the complainant had requested verification of the legality of the use of votes won by the political entity Za Slobodu, Pravdu i Opstanak (ZSPO) in six polling centers in the Municipality of Prizren. She claimed that these votes had been obtained in settlements with a Bosniak-majority community and that this should be verified in order to protect the guaranteed seats for the Serb community.

The Supreme Court found that the ECAP decision was correct and supported by law, since the electoral legislation does not link the validity of the vote to the ethnic affiliation of the voter and there is no constitutional or legal basis for votes to be assessed according to the ethnic structure of a settlement.

According to the Court, the right to vote is individual and every citizen is free to vote for the political entity of their choice, regardless of ethnic affiliation.

The Court also recalled that the Constitution simultaneously guarantees the individual right to vote and the mechanism of guaranteed seats for non-majority communities, but these guarantees do not give electoral bodies or courts the right to categorize votes according to the ethnic affiliation of voters or to draw conclusions about their validity on the basis of demographic data.

The Court also found that the complainant had not provided concrete evidence of ballot manipulation, interference with election materials or any other violation of the electoral process. According to it, a statistical discrepancy between the demographic structure of settlements and the number of votes received by a political entity, in the absence of evidence of electoral irregularities and a clear legal basis, cannot produce legal consequences regarding the validity of votes or the election result.

With judgment AA.nr.32/2026, the Supreme Court rejected as unfounded the complaint of Bekim Haxhiu, a candidate for deputy in the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo from the political entity Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), filed against ECAP decision ZP.Anr.54/2026.

Haxhiu had claimed that the ECAP decision was based on an incorrect and incomplete determination of the facts, on the incorrect application of substantive and procedural electoral law, and that his constitutional rights to be elected, procedural equality and the right to an effective legal remedy had been violated.

He had requested a full recount of the preferential votes of PDK candidates in polling stations that were not included in the sample of 185 polling stations.

The Supreme Court found that the complainant had not presented sufficient evidence to justify a full recount, while the report of the Central Election Commission (CEC) on the recount of 185 polling stations did not constitute a sufficient basis for such action.

According to the Court, the corrections identified or reflected in the report do not create an objective basis for concluding that the counting process was characterized by systematic irregularities. The nature and distribution of these corrections, in its assessment, show that they were sporadic and did not reach such a level as to undermine the credibility of the final result or the integrity of the counting process.

Meanwhile, with judgment AA.nr.33/2026, the Supreme Court rejected as unfounded the complaint of parliamentary candidate Qëndrim Kryeziu, from the political entity Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), headquartered in Prishtina, filed against ECAP decision ZP.Anr.55/2026.

Kryeziu had claimed that ECAP had wrongly treated his complaint as a matter already adjudicated, even though, according to him, the complaint raised a broader issue concerning the credibility of the final result of the PDK list. He argued that the changes identified in 90 of 110 PDK candidates, at a time when only a small portion of the votes had been verified, raised doubts about the accuracy of the final result. He also claimed that the CEC report proved the existence of a systematic flaw in the initial counting process and requested a full recount of the preferential votes of PDK candidates, as well as the suspension of certification of the election result until the completion of this process.

After reviewing the case file, the Supreme Court found that ECAP had properly addressed the complainant’s claims and had concluded that the complaint was unfounded. The Court found that the claims presented were based on the same data and recount results that had also been reviewed earlier, while the CEC report did not prove the existence of systematic irregularities that would require a full recount of votes. It was also found that the recount of 185 polling stations had been carried out within the control mechanisms provided for by electoral legislation and not as a result of a finding of systematic irregularities in the counting process.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court found that the ECAP decisions were made in accordance with the Constitution and Law no. 08/L-228 on General Elections in the Republic of Kosovo, while the appellate claims were not supported by convincing evidence that would justify intervention in the final election results.

The post Supreme Court Rejects Five Complaints, Clearing the Way for Certification of Results appeared first on Albeu.com.

In a brief statement to kp, he said they are currently waiting for the certification of the results.

“We are waiting for the certification of the results, thank you,” Kurti said briefly.

The Central Election Commission has announced the results of the June 7 elections, in which VV received 47.13%, PDK 19.44%, LDK 16.69% and AAK 6.74%.

The post Kurti: The formation of institutions is awaiting certification of the results appeared first on Albeu.com.

In a statement to the media, Kurti stressed that the certification of the results is being awaited first, as well as the review of complaints.

He said that the necessary discussions will take place only after this process is completed.

“First we have to wait for the certification of the election results, and the handling of complaints, and then without losing time we will have the necessary communications and discussions,” Kurti said.

Currently, the role of acting president is being held by Albulena Haxhiu, following the end of Vjosa Osmani’s presidential mandate in April.

The final results of the June 7 elections were announced by the Central Election Commission on June 27.

From these elections, Vetëvendosje emerged as the leading force in a pre-election coalition with Guxo and Alternativa, with 47.13% and 53 seats. The Democratic Party of Kosovo won 19.44% and 22 seats, the Democratic League of Kosovo 16.69% and 18 seats, while the Alliance won 6.74% and seven seats.

The post Kurti on the new president: Talks with parties to begin after the certification of the results appeared first on Albeu.com.

CEC Chairman Kreshnik Radoniqi said after the Commission completed the vote count that “With 10 votes in favor, the final result of the June 7, 2026 elections is declared.”

He also explained that, following this decision, candidates may file complaints against the announcement of the result within 48 hours, starting from 12:00 today and ending at 12:00 on Monday.

According to Radoniqi, Vetëvendosje Movement, with 47.13%, secured 53 seats; the Democratic Party of Kosovo, with 19.44%, won 22 seats; the Democratic League of Kosovo won 18 seats; while the Alliance won seven seats.

The CEC had been scheduled to meet today at 11:00, with the announcement of the final results of the early elections for the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, held on June 7, on the agenda.

According to the preliminary results published earlier, the Vetëvendosje Movement will have 53 MPs, the PDK 22 MPs, the LDK 18, while the Alliance will have 7 MPs.

Following the announcement of the final results by the CEC, procedures are expected to begin for their certification, followed by talks on forming the new institutions.

The post CEC publishes final results of the June 7 elections appeared first on Albeu.com.

At today’s meeting, the CEC officially announced the final result of this electoral process.

“With 10 votes in favor, the final result of the June 7, 2026 elections is declared,” said CEC chairman Kreshnik Radoniqi after the Commission’s votes were counted.

Radoniqi said that following this decision, candidates have the right to appeal the announcement of the result within 48 hours, a deadline that begins today at 12:00 and ends on Monday at 12:00.

According to the preliminary results, the Vetëvendosje Movement will have 53 deputies. The PDK will have 22 deputies, the LDK 18, while the Alliance will have 7 deputies.

Radoniqi said that the Vetëvendosje Movement, with 47.13%, has won 53 seats, the Democratic Party of Kosovo with 19.44% has won 22 seats, the Democratic League of Kosovo 18 seats, while the Alliance has won 7 seats.

After the CEC announces the final results, procedures for their certification are expected to continue, followed by talks on forming the new institutions.

The post CEC approves the final results of the June 7 elections appeared first on Albeu.com.

The agenda for this meeting includes the announcement of the final results of the early elections for the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, held on June 7.

Preliminary results show that the Vetëvendosje Movement is expected to secure 53 seats.

According to the same data, the PDK will have 22 seats, the LDK 18, while the Alliance will have 7 seats.

After the CEC makes the final results public, procedures for their certification are expected to begin, followed by talks on forming the new institutions.

The post CEC expected to publish final election results today appeared first on Albeu.com.

On the agenda is the announcement of the final results of the early elections for the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo, held on June 7.

Preliminary results show that the Vetëvendosje Movement will have 53 MPs, the PDK 22 MPs, the LDK 18 and the Alliance 7 MPs.

After the CEC announces the final results, procedures for their certification are expected to continue, after which talks on forming the new institutions are expected to begin.

The post Central Election Commission expected to publish final election results tomorrow appeared first on Albeu.com.