Two individuals have been handcuffed by the Kosovo Special Prosecution and placed under a 48-hour detention order, suspected of committing war crimes against civilians.

According to the official announcement, suspects M.J. and M.B. are accused of perpetrating violence against the civilian population in the Mitrovica region during the 1999 conflict.

The prosecution stressed that investigations are ongoing and, for the sake of protecting the criminal proceedings, no further details will be released at this stage.

On the other hand, the Serbian List – the main political formation of Serbs in Kosovo, which enjoys Belgrade’s support – described the war crime charges as an instrument of pressure against their community rather than a genuine pursuit of justice.

The party considered the arrests as part of a continuous campaign of intimidation by Kosovo authorities, directed by acting Prime Minister Albin Kurti.

The Office for Kosovo in the Government of Serbia also reacted sharply, labeling the detention carried out in Zubin Potok as an act of terrorism, revenge, and threats against Serbs.

During the 1998-1999 war in Kosovo, more than 13,000 civilians lost their lives and thousands more went missing.

The search is still ongoing for around 1,600 people who have not been found, the vast majority of whom are Albanians.

Kosovo’s institutions have recently intensified arrests and the filing of indictments for war crimes.

Investigations into these crimes were initially conducted by the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) during the 2000-2008 period, later transferring to EULEX, the European Union’s rule-of-law mission.

In 2018, EULEX handed over the war crimes case files to Kosovo’s local judicial system.

The post Two arrested for war crimes in Kosovo, Belgrade and Serbian List erupt with accusations appeared first on Albeu.com.

The statement by Serbia’s Minister of Public Administration and Local Self-Government, Snezhana Paunović, that if she had been in the position of former Serbian President Slobodan Milošević in 1998, she would have “ethnically cleansed Kosovo,” has been strongly condemned by the European Union.

Her remarks prompted numerous reactions, as they were seen as a justification of rhetoric advocating ethnic cleansing and as a statement contrary to the principles on which the European Union is founded.

Responding to the issue, European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said that the EU does not comment on individual remarks by political officials. Nevertheless, she made it clear that there can be no room in Europe for language that justifies, incites or glorifies ethnic cleansing. Hipper also reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to human rights, peace and reconciliation in the region.

The Serbian minister made the statement at a time when relations between Kosovo and Serbia remain fragile. The European Union continues to call on both sides to refrain from inflammatory language and actions that could heighten tensions or undermine the process of normalizing relations.

It should also be recalled that Kosovo has declared the Serbian minister “persona non grata.”

Activist Agim Aliçkaj spoke to “Bota sot” about the issue. According to him, Paunović’s statement about the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo is not an isolated case, but reflects the continuation of historic Serbian policies that, he claims, have sought to expel and eradicate Albanians from their lands.

Aliçkaj said that Minister Paunović’s position on ethnically cleansing Kosovo of Albanians is neither new nor surprising. He described it as a continuation of the centuries-old efforts of a chauvinistic, racist and hegemonic Serbian policy aimed at eradicating Albanians.

According to him, there have been numerous projects to eliminate Albanians and seize their lands for the Serbs. He listed the 1844 Načertanije, Čubrilović’s 1937 memorandum titled “The Expulsion of the Albanians,” the 1986 Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU), and Operation “Horseshoe” of 1998–1999, organized by the regime of war criminal Slobodan Milošević.

The activist said that Čubrilović had presented in detail the methods and means of implementing what he called Serbia’s inhumane plans. Aliçkaj recalled his assertion that “the existence of the Serbian nation depends on the nonexistence of the Albanian nation.” He added that all these plans, in his view, were the joint product of state regimes, the Serbian Academy of Sciences and the Serbian Orthodox Church.

Aliçkaj went on to say that Serbia’s plans for genocide in Kosovo failed thanks to Albanian resistance, the KLA’s war and NATO’s intervention. Nevertheless, according to him, the ideology of hatred toward Albanians remains present in Serbia, partly because no “denazification” process took place after the war.

He said that the Albanian people’s heroic, centuries-long resistance, waged in various forms, culminated in the KLA’s war of liberation and NATO’s bombing of Serbia in 1999. For this reason, he said, Serbia’s genocide against Albanians ultimately failed, and did so shamefully. Nevertheless, Aliçkaj said Serbia’s futile aspirations continue, as demonstrated by Minister Paunović’s latest statement.

According to the activist, a significant portion of the Serbian people, even after the bombing and the loss of four brutal wars, has still not broken free from the myths and deceptions of a political class he described as sick. He said this class continues to rule by inciting hatred toward Albanians and other peoples of the Balkans.

Aliçkaj described the failure of Western countries to undertake the “denazification” of Serbian society following Serbia’s military defeat, freeing it from hatred toward other nations and from what he called the dead myths of the Middle Ages, as a major mistake.

He further criticized the approach of the European Union and the United States toward Serbia, saying they are pursuing a lenient policy and taking no concrete action over its statements and conduct. At the same time, according to Aliçkaj, Kosovo is being subjected to unfair pressure, amounting to a double standard.

The activist said that the European Community and the United States are continuing what he called the mistaken and failed policy of appeasing the Serbian regime. He stressed that this regime is led by Aleksandar Vučić, an associate of Milošević, while this approach, in his view, is motivated by illusory geostrategic interests aimed at drawing Serbia away from Russian influence. Aliçkaj added that the Serbian regime is exploiting this situation without restraint or mercy.

As evidence, he cited what he described as the weak and unserious response by European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper, as well as the positions of many representatives of Western countries. According to him, the only exceptions are a few lawmakers or thinkers with strong humanitarian principles, while concrete punitive action over Minister Paunović’s inhumane statement is entirely absent.

Aliçkaj claimed that no concrete punitive measures have been taken against Serbia over the terrorist acts in Banjska and Ujman, its refusal to sign the Brussels agreement, and its destabilization of Kosovo and the Balkans. On the other hand, he said, Kosovo is being asked to make further concessions to Serbia through unfair pressure, including sanctions against Kosovo for enforcing the law in the north. He called this double standard shocking.

In conclusion, the activist said that reactions from Albania, part of the Albanian political establishment and the international community have been insufficient. He warned that without punishing those responsible and without fundamental changes in Serbian policy, long-term peace cannot be established in the Balkans.

Aliçkaj described the reaction of the mother country and of the person he characterized as Albania’s illegitimate pro-Serbian prime minister, Edi Rama, as worthless and shameful. He used the same terms to describe the silence of representatives of several parties and part of the press in Kosovo and other Albanian territories.

According to him, the statement by Paunović, whom he called the minister of hatred of a Serbian state built on hatred and myths, poses a danger. Aliçkaj claimed that her aim is to deceive Serbian voters in the upcoming elections and divert international attention from the destructive actions of the Vučić regime. He added that the regime is taking no action against the minister, while Vučić is already presenting himself as a “constructive leader committed to peace.”

In his concluding statement to “Bota sot,” Aliçkaj said that everyone must understand this message, including both national and non-national Albanians, as well as international actors with differing positions. According to him, without punishing Serbian criminals, removing the Serbian government that he described as chauvinistic, racist and hegemonic, and denazifying the segment of the Serbian population burdened by hatred toward others, there will never be stability, security and lasting peace in the Balkans.

The post Agim Aliçkaj Warns After Serbian Minister’s Statement: Without Fundamental Changes, the Balkans Will Not Have Lasting Peace appeared first on Albeu.com.

These comments have been met with widespread condemnation, as they are seen as an attempt to legitimize ethnic cleansing rhetoric and run counter to the fundamental principles of the European Union.

Anitta Hipper, spokesperson for the European Commission, stressed that while the institution does not usually comment on individual statements, there is no room in Europe for language that justifies, promotes, or glorifies ethnic cleansing. She reaffirmed the EU’s unwavering commitment to human rights, peace, and reconciliation in the region.

This statement comes at a time when relations between Kosovo and Serbia remain extremely delicate, and Brussels continues to call on both sides to distance themselves from provocative language and actions that endanger the normalization process.

Meanwhile, Kosovo has declared Minister Paunović persona ‘non grata’.

Regarding this development, activist Agim Aliçkaj gave a statement to “Bota sot”, warning that this declaration is far from spontaneous but reflects an unbroken line of historical Serbian policies aimed at the displacement and destruction of Albanians from their lands.

Aliçkaj placed the minister’s speech in a broader context, noting that plans for the elimination of Albanians date back to the Načertanije of 1844, continue with Čubrilović’s 1937 Memorandum on the “Expulsion of the Albanians”, the 1986 Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, and culminate in the “Horseshoe” operation of 1998–1999, organized by the Milošević regime. He recalled that Čubrilović had clearly stated that the survival of the Serbian nation depended on the disappearance of the Albanian nation, adding that these plans are the product of collaboration between state regimes, the Serbian Academy, and the Serbian Orthodox Church.

Fortunately, according to him, the unbroken resistance of the Albanians, the liberation war of the KLA, and NATO’s intervention in 1999 caused the Serbian genocide in Kosovo to fail. Nevertheless, he underscores that the ideology of hatred towards Albanians remains alive in Serbia, partly due to the lack of a “denazification” process of Serbian society after the conflict.

He argued that a major mistake by Western powers was precisely the failure to liberate the Serbian people from medieval myths and to promote genuine reconciliation, leaving intact a political class that feeds the electorate with hatred towards neighbors.

Aliçkaj sharply criticized the approach of the European Union and the United States, describing it as a policy of appeasement towards the regime led by Aleksandar Vučić, a former collaborator of Milošević. According to him, the tepid reaction of the EC spokesperson, as well as the lack of concrete punitive measures for acts like the terrorist attack in Banjska and Ujman, or for the non-signing of the Brussels agreement, reveal a shocking double standard. Meanwhile, he added, the unfair pressure on Kosovo for further concessions, including sanctions for the implementation of the law in the north, reinforces this impression.

Finally, the activist called the reaction of official Albania and Prime Minister Edi Rama worthless and shameful, as well as the silence of a part of the parties and press in the Albanian space. He warned that Minister Paunović’s statement is dangerous and serves to deceive Serbian voters ahead of elections, as well as to divert international attention from the destructive actions of Vučić’s regime. Aliçkaj concluded that without the punishment of criminals, the removal of a chauvinist government, and the eradication of hatred from a segment of Serbian society, there will never be lasting peace and security in the Balkans.

The post Powerful warning from activist: Serbian minister’s words on ethnic cleansing reveal an ongoing danger for the region appeared first on Albeu.com.

The statement sparked numerous reactions, as it was viewed as a justification of ethnic-cleansing rhetoric and a stance contrary to the fundamental principles of the European Union.

European Commission spokesperson Anitta Hipper said the EU does not comment on individual statements by political figures. However, she stressed that rhetoric justifying, inciting or glorifying ethnic cleansing has no place in Europe, reaffirming the bloc’s commitment to human rights, peace and regional reconciliation.

The reactions come at a time when Kosovo-Serbia relations remain fragile. The European Union continues to call on both sides to avoid inflammatory language and actions that could increase tensions or undermine the normalization of relations.

Meanwhile, Kosovo has declared the Serbian minister ‘non grata’.

On the matter, activist Agim Aliçkaj gave a statement to “Bota Sot”, describing Paunović’s remarks as part of the continuation of historical Serbian policies which, according to him, have aimed to expel and eliminate Albanians from their lands.

He said the Serbian minister’s statement regarding the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanians was neither new nor surprising, considering it a continuation of centuries-long efforts by Serbian policy, which he described as chauvinistic, racist and hegemonic.

According to Aliçkaj, projects aimed at eliminating Albanians and taking their land include the 1844 Načertanije, Čubrilović’s 1937 memorandum “The Expulsion of the Albanians”, the 1986 Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU), and Operation “Horseshoe” of 1998–1999, organized by the regime of war criminal Slobodan Milošević.

The activist said Čubrilović had set out in detail the methods for implementing what he described as inhumane plans, citing the assertion that “the existence of the Serbian nation depends on the non-existence of the Albanian nation”. He added that, in his view, Serbian plans had been the joint product of state regimes, the Serbian Academy of Sciences and the Serbian Orthodox Church.

Aliçkaj assessed that Serbian plans for genocide in Kosovo failed thanks to Albanian resistance, the Kosovo Liberation Army’s war and NATO’s intervention. However, he said the ideology of hatred toward Albanians continues to exist in Serbia, partly due to the absence of a “denazification” process after the war.

According to him, the heroic centuries-long resistance of Albanians in various forms, crowned by the Kosovo Liberation Army’s liberation war and NATO’s bombing of Serbia in 1999, ultimately caused Serbian genocide against Albanians to fail. He stated that Serbian aspirations continue to be expressed through Paunović’s latest statement.

He added that a large part of the Serbian population, even after the bombing and the loss of four brutal wars, has, in his view, not freed itself from the myths and deceptions of a political class that feeds it hatred toward Albanians and other Balkan peoples.

Aliçkaj called the lack of “denazification” of Serbian society after Serbia’s military defeat a major mistake by Western states, as well as the failure to free it from hatred toward other nations and the dead myths of the Middle Ages.

He further stated that the European Community and America are pursuing a misguided and failed policy of rapprochement with the Serbian regime led by Aleksandar Vučić, whom he described as a collaborator of Milošević. According to him, this policy is linked to interests he called illusory, aimed at pulling Serbia away from Russian influence, while the Serbian regime is exploiting the situation without limits.

He described Anitta Hipper’s reaction, as well as the reactions of many representatives of Western countries, as weak and unserious, except, in his view, for some MPs or thinkers with strong human principles. Aliçkaj stressed that no concrete punitive measures had been taken over Minister Paunović’s statement.

He also claimed that no punitive measures had been taken against Serbia over the terrorist acts in Banjska and Ujman, its failure to sign the Brussels Agreement, and the destabilization of Kosovo and the Balkans. On the other hand, he said Kosovo is subjected to unfair pressure to make further concessions to Serbia, including sanctions against Kosovo for enforcing the law in the north, which he described as a shocking double standard.

In conclusion, Aliçkaj said the reaction from Albania, part of Albanian politics and the international community had been insufficient. He warned that, in his view, without punishing those responsible and without fundamental changes in Serbian policy, lasting peace in the Balkans cannot be guaranteed.

He described the reaction of the mother state and Albania’s illegitimate pro-Serbian prime minister, Edi Rama, as worthless and shameful. According to him, the same applies to the lack of reaction from representatives of certain parties and part of the press in Kosovo and other Albanian lands.

Aliçkaj described Paunović’s statement as dangerous, calling her a minister of hatred in a Serbian state of hatred and myths. According to him, its aim is to deceive Serbian voters in the upcoming elections and divert international attention from the destructive actions of Vučić’s regime, which, according to Aliçkaj, does not take measures against her but presents itself as a “constructive leader committed to peace”.

He concluded that without punishing Serbian criminals, removing the Serbian government that he described as chauvinistic, racist and hegemonic, and without the “denazification” of the part of the Serbian population burdened by hatred toward others, there will be no calm, security or lasting peace in the Balkans.

The post Aliçkaj Raises Concerns After Serbian Minister’s Statement: Without Fundamental Changes, the Balkans Will Have No Lasting Peace appeared first on Albeu.com.

In its reaction, the institute recalls that the atrocities committed during the 1998–1999 period were met with international justice, where the highest political, military, and police figures of Milošević’s apparatus were convicted for war crimes in Kosovo.

“Despite this, even to this day, high officials of the Serbian state continue to use language that minimizes or legitimizes policies that left behind thousands killed, mass deportations, acts of sexual violence, and enforced disappearances. In parallel, the process of documenting war crimes continues in Kosovo. We at IKKL collect evidence and testimonies, convinced that they form the basis for establishing justice, acknowledging guilt, and seeking institutional apology,” the statement says.

Highlighting the importance of confronting history, the reaction ends with the message that only an honest treatment of the past remains essential to building mutual trust and ensuring long-term peace in the region.

The post Kosovo harshly condemns Serbian minister’s statement on ethnic cleansing appeared first on Albeu.com.

Through a post on social media, she mocked the fact that President Vjosa Osmani has not reacted to the discussions taking place within the LDK.

Matoshi’s post:

Hey, what is Vjosa saying about these developments?

Lumir supported her with No. 1, and she hasn’t even spoken up.

Haha, she changes the subject quickly 🙂

The post Adriana Matoshi Mocks the Situation in the LDK and Brings Vjosa Osmani Into the Comment appeared first on Albeu.com.