The government has updated, through a new decision, the rules governing expenses for senior state officials and public administration employees during overseas assignments.

This is the document containing the new regulation, which entered into force at the end of July and sets out in detail the criteria for travel, accommodation and daily allowances.

Under the regulation, the President of the Republic, the Prime Minister, the Speaker of Parliament, the Deputy Prime Minister and ministers will be accommodated in five-star hotels.

Members of Parliament, ministry secretary-generals and director-generals will stay in four-star hotels, while other public administration employees will be accommodated in three-star hotels.

For security reasons, members of the Republican Guard accompanying state officials may stay in the same hotel as the person they are protecting, regardless of the hotel’s category.

The decision also sets the amount of daily allowances for overseas travel. The President of the Republic, the Prime Minister and the Speaker of Parliament will receive a daily allowance of between 120 and 150 euros. For ministers and the Deputy Prime Minister, the allowance ranges from 80 to 120 euros per day.

Members of Parliament, deputy ministers and secretary-generals will receive 70–80 euros per day, while director-generals and ambassadors will receive 50–60 euros.

For other public administration employees, the daily allowance has been set at 45–55 euros. Another change concerns the way expenses are paid.

Travel tickets and hotel accommodation will be booked and paid for directly by the relevant institution.

Meanwhile, officials will have only the amount allocated for daily expenses transferred to their bank accounts before departure.

The post Senior officials in 5-star hotels / Daily allowances of up to 150 euros, with tickets and accommodation paid directly by the state appeared first on Albeu.com.

Traffic Police Director Perlat Vatoci has announced the new amendments to the Road Code, which came into force on August 7, 2026. According to him, the new measures are intended to improve road safety, raise driver awareness and reduce the number of accidents.

One of the new provisions postpones the right to obtain a driving license for up to one year for people caught driving without a license. When the offense is committed by minors, this period is extended to up to two years.

Drivers found to have more than 0.5 grams of alcohol per liter of blood who have previously been penalized for driving under the influence of alcohol or while intoxicated will have their driving licenses revoked permanently.

Vatoci said this change is linked to the need to curb serious accidents caused by driving under the influence of alcohol.

The amendments approved through Law No. 58/2026, “On Several Additions and Amendments to the Road Code of the Republic of Albania,” also include tougher measures against dangerous behavior on the road.

For drivers who fail to adjust their speed on roads with limited visibility, carry out aggressive maneuvers, frequently change lanes without signaling or commit violations that endanger other road users in urban areas, near schools, intersections or junctions, the administrative fine has been increased to between 20,000 and 60,000 lekë.

According to the Traffic Police, determining the penalty takes into account the location where the violation occurs and clarifies its objective elements.

The increase in the fine was deemed reasonable because of the high risk posed by these actions and the rise in road incidents in urban areas.

Using a mobile phone while driving is now also punishable for cyclists, riders of motor vehicles of up to 50 cc and users of motorized scooters.

A driving license will also be suspended when a driver has been penalized twice within the same year for using a mobile phone. Previously, suspension was imposed after three violations.

Police consider mobile phone use while driving to be one of the main causes of loss of control over a vehicle and, consequently, of road accidents.

Special rules have also been established for new drivers who obtained their driving licenses within the past 24 months. Specific measures regarding driving under the influence of alcohol and special speed restrictions apply to this category.

Another amendment removes the option of converting the suspension of a driving license issued by the Albanian state into payment of an amount equal to twice the maximum administrative fine stipulated for the violation.

Before August 7, drivers cited for Road Code violations that carried both a fine and suspension of their driving license could pay twice the maximum fine to avoid the additional penalty. Under the new amendments, this option has been removed and the driving license is suspended automatically.

The main amendments, which came into force on August 7, 2026, stipulate that people caught without a driving license will have their right to obtain one postponed for up to one year, or up to two years for minors. In every case, Traffic Police units within the State Police will inform the DSH­TRR, as the institution responsible for issuing driving licenses, so that the individuals identified can be entered into the system and the relevant procedures can be followed.

Traffic Police units across the country have been informed of the latest amendments and instructed to implement them correctly.

The State Police have called on drivers not to exceed the permitted speed limit, not to drive vehicles or motorcycles under the influence of alcohol, particularly while intoxicated, not to use mobile phones while driving, and to avoid prohibited overtaking and dangerous or aggressive maneuvers.

The appeal also comes amid the high number of violations detected by smart monitoring vehicles and the strengthening of measures aimed at protecting lives.

According to the police, punishment is not the primary objective. The goal is to prevent violations, avoid accidents and protect lives.

Every driver must behave responsibly at all times while behind the wheel and comply with traffic rules.

Road safety requires everyone’s commitment. The contribution of every road user helps make traffic safer and save lives.

The post New Road Code: From Permanent License Revocation for Drink-Driving to Fines of up to 60,000 Lekë—Here Are the Traffic Rules That Have Changed appeared first on Albeu.com.

SafeJournalists has raised concerns about several provisions in the new internal rules of the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime (GJKKO), which are expected to take effect on September 1, 2026.

The international network for the protection of journalists acknowledges the court’s obligation to maintain security and ensure the proper conduct of proceedings, but warns that the combined effect of several provisions could significantly undermine freedom of information.

The statement emphasizes that Articles 76 and 93(16) impose a complete ban on bringing phones, laptops and other electronic devices into the courtroom.

According to SafeJournalists, this measure makes it more difficult for journalists to take notes, verify information and communicate with their newsrooms in real time.

The strict annual accreditation system, together with the requirement to provide 24 hours’ notice of attendance at a hearing, has also raised concerns.

The network believes these requirements create an administrative burden and could discriminate against independent journalists, new reporters and small media outlets.

Objections have also been raised regarding the handling, through accreditation, of ethical issues or matters involving the use of artificial intelligence, as well as the lack of a rapid appeals procedure for refusals.

Full statement:

SafeJournalists expresses its concern over several media-related provisions in the new Internal Rules, approved by the Special Court of First Instance for Corruption and Organized Crime through Decision No. 49, dated July 17, 2026. The document was published on July 31, 2026, and is scheduled to take effect on September 1, 2026.

The network acknowledges that the Special Court has a responsibility to guarantee security, protect everyone involved in proceedings, ensure the integrity of judicial proceedings and facilitate the proper administration of justice. It also welcomes the measures included in the rules concerning transparency, equal treatment and reasoned decision-making.

However, the combined application of several of these provisions could restrict journalists’ ability to follow proceedings directly, take accurate notes, communicate with their newsrooms and report without delay on matters of exceptionally high public interest.

Article 90 provides for individual accreditation valid for one year, while Article 93(1) sets out the access arrangements for accredited media representatives. The rules do not make it clear whether a journalist without permanent accreditation at the Special Court may attend, as a member of the public, a hearing that would otherwise be open.

Meanwhile, Annex 7 requires independent journalists to prove that they have engaged in professional activity during the preceding 12 months. Such a requirement could disadvantage freelance journalists, independent reporters, those at the beginning of their careers or journalists newly assigned to cover the Court. Accreditation can help with identification and ensuring equal access, but it must not be used as a filter or as an unnecessary condition for attending public proceedings.

The procedure for obtaining access may also create an unnecessary bureaucratic burden, particularly for independent journalists and those working for small newsrooms. When the special procedure under Article 93(2) applies, Article 93(3) establishes as a rule that requests must be submitted at least 24 hours before the hearing.

In addition, journalists may be required to reconfirm their attendance, comply with the general rule allowing only one representative from each media outlet and, when audiovisual coverage is sought, submit a separate request under Article 95. Such procedures may be useful for organizational purposes when there is a specific reason related to courtroom capacity or security, but they must not become a routine prerequisite for attending public hearings. A rapid and straightforward process is needed for urgent hearings, last-minute notices and reporter substitutions.

SafeJournalists is particularly concerned about Articles 76 and 93(16), which do not allow journalists admitted solely to attend a hearing to bring or use mobile phones, laptops and other electronic devices. A ban on unauthorized broadcasts or recordings is legitimate, but a blanket restriction also prevents silent electronic note-taking, written reporting, contact with editors, checking legal information and using devices for accessibility purposes.

For this reason, less restrictive and practically workable solutions should be considered. These could include using devices in silent mode, creating designated media areas, disabling or restricting camera functions and allowing the presiding judge to issue instructions tailored to the specific circumstances.

Article 95 specifically addresses audiovisual coverage of court proceedings, including photography, filming, audio recording and broadcasting. Requiring prior judicial authorization and imposing restrictions on this type of reporting may be justified when the aim is to protect witnesses, minors, privacy, evidence, courtroom order or the proper administration of justice.

Nevertheless, any restrictive measure must be based on the specific circumstances of the hearing, be reasoned and be proportionate. Less restrictive alternatives should be considered before imposing a complete ban. Footage or materials prepared by the Court, or those distributed through a “media pool” system, may facilitate access when there are technical or security constraints, but they should supplement rather than routinely replace the independent presence of journalists in the courtroom.

Another issue concerns Article 96(3)(e)–(g), which addresses artificial intelligence manipulation, content deemed misleading and the publication of photographs of identifiable individuals when their identification is considered unnecessary. Protection against false manipulation and unlawful publication is justified. However, the accreditation system must not be used to control editorial decisions or post-publication conduct occurring outside the Court’s premises. Such cases should be addressed through applicable legislation, legal remedies, correction procedures and professional ethical standards.

Under Article 98, measures against journalists may begin with a warning, proceed to the suspension of accreditation for up to six months and extend to its revocation. For the most serious sanctions, the rules contain several important safeguards, including the requirement for specific facts, the issuance of a reasoned order and the opportunity for the journalist or media outlet to present its position.

Despite these safeguards, the document does not clearly establish an expedited review procedure through which a refusal of access or a measure affecting accreditation can be resolved before the relevant hearing loses its journalistic relevance.

SafeJournalists calls on the Special Court to suspend implementation of the contested media-related provisions and conduct a focused review process through meaningful consultations with journalists, media organizations, legal experts and civil society.

The revised rules must ensure that any restriction on media access and reporting has a legal basis, is necessary, proportionate, clearly formulated and applied equally. They must enable journalists to carry out their work under reasonable and practical conditions, while refusals, exclusions or measures against them must be reasoned and subject to rapid and effective review.

The SafeJournalists network will notify relevant stakeholders in the country and abroad about this issue and will continue to monitor how the rules are implemented.

Pristina – Skopje – Sarajevo – Zagreb – Belgrade – Podgorica – Tirana, August 7, 2026

Association of Journalists of Kosovo

Association of Journalists of Macedonia

Association of Journalists of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Croatian Journalists’ Association

Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia

Trade Union of Media of Montenegro

The post SafeJournalists Opposes GJKKO’s New Media Rules: Restrictions on Journalists and Public Information Must Be Reviewed appeared first on Albeu.com.