Albin Kurti, Kosovo’s acting prime minister, said the political agreement reached with the Democratic League of Kosovo has suffered a “serious blow,” but stressed that it remains valid. According to him, elections can be avoided if Bekim Sejdiu is elected.

Asked about the possibility of further talks with the LDK leader, Kurti described the agreement as an achievement by both political parties. He said there is still an opportunity to avoid elections and strengthen the institutions.

In a statement to Ekonomia Online, Kurti said that although the political agreement had suffered a serious blow, it had not been invalidated. He described it as a major success for the two political forces, adding that those seeking institutional stability, the avoidance of elections and the strengthening of the state still have an opportunity.

Kurti emphasized that the political agreement had also produced a specific candidate, naming Professor Bekim Sejdiu.

He clarified that the specific name to emerge from the political agreement was precisely that of Professor Bekim Sejdiu.

However, Kurti declined to say whether another candidate for president would be proposed.

The post Kurti: Political pact has been dealt a serious blow, but remains in force appeared first on Albeu.com.

KFOR has decided to begin the gradual transition from its permanent presence on the main bridge over the Ibër River in Mitrovica, while at the Deçan Monastery, the Kosovo Police will be integrated step by step into the international mission’s security architecture. This development is being regarded as particularly significant for Kosovo, as it has sparked debate over strengthening domestic institutions and their responsibility for guaranteeing security throughout the country.

Belgium-based legal expert Skënder Musliu, speaking to “Bota sot,” described KFOR’s move as an important vote of confidence in state institutions and, in particular, the Kosovo Police.

According to Musliu, this was not an unexpected decision, but the culmination of a lengthy process of analyses and assessments conducted by KFOR and NATO in cooperation with Kosovo’s institutions.

He said that, despite developments in the Kosovo Assembly that he described as destructive on the part of the opposition, KFOR delivered positive news several days ago. Musliu recalled that after guarding the bridge over the Ibër River for 27 years, the international mission decided to gradually transfer this responsibility to the Kosovo Police. He also emphasized that KFOR had announced the gradual integration of the Kosovo Police at the Deçan Monastery as well.

Musliu believes that this step was taken only after a detailed review of the security situation and continuous cooperation with the Kosovar authorities.

Referring to statements portraying the news as a surprise, he said that, in his assessment, the decision had been prepared earlier on the basis of numerous analyses by KFOR and NATO military and security experts. He added that the process had also been conducted through consultations and ongoing work with Kosovo’s institutions.

According to the legal expert, one of the key signals conveyed by this decision is KFOR and NATO’s assessment that security in Kosovo has improved and that the Kosovo Police possesses the necessary capabilities to assume greater responsibility.

Musliu said that KFOR and NATO had concluded that peace and security in Kosovo had improved significantly. According to him, the Kosovo Police has been assessed as capable, professional and well trained to manage the situation on the Ibër Bridge, which over the years has been a flashpoint for clashes and interethnic tensions.

He also interprets the decision as a politically significant signal for Kosovo’s institutions, particularly in the face of claims that the Kurti government’s policy toward the north and security issues has jeopardized relations with international partners.

According to Musliu, the trust KFOR is placing in Kosovo’s institutions disproves the accusations and propaganda of the opposition and some media outlets, which claim that Kurti is endangering peace and stability and damaging relations with the international community.

Addressing the importance of the bridge over the Ibër River, Musliu emphasized that for many years it represented more than just a structure linking the two parts of Mitrovica. According to him, the bridge had also become a symbol of Kosovo’s political and institutional division.

He said the significance of the latest development can be better understood by examining the origins of the problems in the north and the long period during which Kosovo’s institutions had limited ability to operate in that part of the territory.

Musliu recalled that from the postwar period until recent years, the bridge over the Ibër symbolized the separation of northern Kosovo, where state institutions did not fully exercise sovereignty. Serbian parallel structures operated in that area, while Belgrade’s influence remained very strong for a long time.

According to him, the north has faced numerous security problems over the years, along with organized crime and the operation of parallel structures. Musliu also mentioned the terrorist attack in Banjska, listing it among the gravest evidence of the threats that have emerged from this part of the territory.

According to him, the changes in the north in recent years should also be analyzed in the context of the restoration of the authority of Kosovo’s institutions in that area of the country.

Musliu stated that Albin Kurti’s rise to power brought numerous changes. He mentioned the closure of parallel institutions, the crackdown on illegal structures and the restoration of the authority of the institutions of the Republic of Kosovo. According to him, the Kurti government not only opened the bridge over the Ibër River, but also built and opened other bridges, while announcing plans to build new ones.

According to Musliu, the gradual transfer of responsibilities from KFOR to the Kosovo Police should be viewed first and foremost as institutional progress benefiting the state, although politically it may also be regarded as an important achievement of the current government.

He emphasized that the development should not be attributed solely to the success of one party or government, because it is primarily an institutional step in the interests of the state of Kosovo. Nevertheless, Musliu assessed that the Kurti government’s policies in the north had helped create the conditions enabling Kosovo’s institutions to assume greater responsibility.

In this context, he also criticized the reaction of the opposition and some media outlets to KFOR’s announcement, saying that an event of this kind deserved greater public attention.

Musliu said KFOR’s positive news should have been treated as the leading story by the media, but that, in his view, the opposition and some media outlets chose to remain silent about it. He added that instead of recognizing the growing trust that an international institution such as KFOR is placing in Kosovo’s institutions, political debate is often limited solely to clashes between parties.

The Belgium-based legal expert assessed that the decision also sends a direct message to Belgrade and to political actors opposed to strengthening Kosovo’s institutions: responsibility for security within Kosovo’s territory is increasingly being transferred to the institutions of the Republic of Kosovo.

According to him, the message is that Kosovo’s institutions are gaining trust and assuming the responsibilities that belong to them in the security sector. Musliu said this is important both for Kosovo’s citizens and for the country’s relations with its international partners, while for Belgrade it demonstrates that the institutional reality in Kosovo cannot be reversed.

In conclusion, Musliu called for KFOR’s decision to be addressed by Kosovo’s political establishment beyond narrow party interests, and for the consolidation of institutions to be viewed as a state-building process.

He told “Bota sot” that institutions and political parties should assess this step beyond immediate interests. Although political differences may exist over the way the country is governed, Musliu emphasized that KFOR’s assessment that the Kosovo Police is prepared to assume greater responsibility should be considered, above all, good news for the state of Kosovo. According to him, this demonstrates that institutions are being consolidated, while sovereignty and state responsibility are being strengthened.

The post Musliu after KFOR’s Move: The Decision Was No Coincidence, Opposition Propaganda Against Kurti Falls Apart appeared first on Albeu.com.

In a public reaction, Ngjela says that public dissatisfaction and the protests are not against the Socialist Party, but are targeting Rama himself. According to him, the head of government is failing to properly read the political climate and the stance of public opinion, while continuing to lead the party despite the opposition.

According to Ngjela, this behavior is causing harm not only to the Socialist Party, but also to Albania, because failing to take into account the demands and grievances of the protesters could lead to rising social tensions.

“The protesters are against Edi Rama, but not against the Socialist Party,” Ngjela emphasizes, arguing that Rama’s departure from the head of the party would be a move that would help calm the political climate.

He warns that if the situation continues to worsen and the protests grow larger, civic revolt may no longer remain directed only against Rama, but may also turn against the Socialist Party. According to him, such a development would bring more serious political and social consequences for the country.

Full statement:

Edi Rama cannot understand who he is and what the Socialist Party is.

Public opinion has taken to protest against Edi Rama. But he is pretending not to understand.

And he is greatly harming the Socialist Party.

Therefore, he must resign as chairman of the Socialist Party.

And this shows that Rama is pathological and not a politician.

The protesters are against Edi Rama.

But not against the Socialist Party.

Therefore, Rama must resign, because his stubbornness in remaining at the head of the Socialist Party is harming both the SP and Albania, because the peaceful revolt of the protesters could aggravate the social situation in Albania.

Whereas until now the protesters have risen up only against Edi Rama, therefore…

If this protest continues with increasing intensity, growing in number, the protesters will also rise against the Socialist Party.

Then???

The post Ngjela calls for Rama to step down from leading the Socialist Party: His stance is harming the party and the country appeared first on Albeu.com.