According to them, this move reflects the continuity of Belgrade’s efforts to strengthen its military capacities and defense industry.

However, experts underline that this decision alone does not constitute proof of an imminent attack on Kosovo.

As they emphasize, any assessment of the risk must be based on a broader picture, including military movements, political rhetoric, and developments on the ground. For this reason, Kosovo’s institutions are being called on to carry out uninterrupted monitoring and increase strategic vigilance. At the same time, the presence of KFOR and NATO’s commitment are considered decisive elements that reduce the possibility of a military adventure in the region.

According to experts, Kosovo should continue strengthening its security capacities and deepen cooperation with international allies. They assess that the latest developments should not cause panic, but should serve as a warning for greater caution and preparedness.

Racaj: The risk of direct aggression against Kosovo remains low thanks to KFOR and NATO

Security professor Muhamet Racaj says Serbia’s decision to mobilize state and church property for the expansion of military projects should be treated seriously, but without causing panic.

“This decision cannot be seen only as an administrative or infrastructure matter, but as part of a long-term strategy to strengthen Serbia’s military capacities and defense industry,” Racaj said in a statement to “Bota sot”.

According to him, for Kosovo this development carries particular weight because of the geographical proximity, the history of conflicts, and the continued rhetoric coming from Belgrade.

“However, unnecessary alarm should not be created. The expansion of military infrastructure does not automatically mean that Serbia is preparing for a military attack on Kosovo,” he stresses.

Racaj adds that this development should be closely followed by security institutions in Kosovo.

“Any increase in military capacities in the region changes, to a certain extent, the strategic balance and requires continuous assessments by local institutions and international partners,” the professor says.

He assesses that, for the moment, the possibility of direct military aggression against Kosovo remains low.

“This is mainly thanks to the presence of KFOR and NATO’s engagement in preserving stability in Kosovo and the Western Balkans. This mechanism constitutes the biggest obstacle to any military adventure,” Racaj says.

However, the professor draws attention to the fact that Serbia is continuing to invest in increasing its military capacities.

“Belgrade is continuously investing in the modernization of its armed forces, in the expansion of industrial capacities, and in supporting infrastructure. This shows that it aims to increase military power and strategic influence in the region,” he says.

According to Racaj, Kosovo should continue strengthening its defense capacities.

“Kosovo should continue developing its own defense capacities, deepen cooperation with allies, and accelerate Euro-Atlantic integration,” he stresses.

In conclusion, Racaj underlines that Serbia’s decision should not be seen as an immediate threat, but neither should it be ignored.

“It should serve as a signal for strategic vigilance, continuous monitoring, and the further strengthening of security institutions, in full coordination with international partners,” Professor Muhamet Racaj concludes.

Berisha says Serbia’s expansion of military projects affects the security architecture in the region

Security expert Fidair Berisha also assesses that Serbia’s decision to mobilize state and church property for the expansion of military projects should be viewed seriously, but not automatically read as a direct threat to Kosovo.

“I think Serbia’s decision to mobilize state and church property for the expansion of military projects should be treated seriously and monitored closely, but it should not automatically be interpreted as a direct threat to Kosovo,” Berisha says.

According to him, this step shows that Serbia continues to attach importance to strengthening its military capacities.

“This decision shows that Serbia continues to attach importance to strengthening its military capacities, which affects the security architecture in the region. For Kosovo, this is a development of particular importance because of the geographical proximity, the history of tensions, and the ongoing challenges in relations between the two countries,” he says.

In his conversation with “Bota sot”, Berisha stresses that this decision alone cannot be considered evidence of an immediate military risk.

“I would not say that this decision alone constitutes evidence of an immediate military risk for Kosovo. Any threat assessment should be based on a broader analysis, taking into account other factors as well, such as military force movements, political rhetoric, developments on the ground, and the information available to security institutions,” he says.

According to Berisha, the latest developments should be seen as a signal for greater vigilance, but not for inciting panic.

“In my assessment, this development should serve as a signal for greater vigilance and continuous monitoring, but not to create panic or draw premature conclusions,” he stresses.

In the end, the expert adds that Kosovo should continue strengthening its security capacities and cooperation with international partners.

“Kosovo should continue to strengthen its security capacities and maintain close coordination with international allies, who remain a key factor for stability and security in the region,” Fidair Berisha concludes for “Bota sot”.

The post Serbia’s military developments prompt caution in Kosovo, experts say vigilance is needed without alarm appeared first on Albeu.com.